3 Criteria For Goals That Will Truly Motivate Your Team

I'm sure all of us are looking for ways to inspire our athletes to achieve their highest potential. And I'm sure all of us agree that goal setting is an integral part to any successful season. Based on his TEDtalk, "Why We Do What We Do" , Tony Robbins gives us a "map" to properly motivating our teams. First, we have to give each individual a role on the team. Then we have to find out how to meet their emotional needs. Finally, we give them the tools to make their team experience positive. Read on to find out how!

3 Things Coaches Should Understand in Order to Motivate Our Teams

Three questions. Robbins says that every decision we make (Will I go all out in practice? Will I try something new and risk looking bad until I master the skill?) Requires us to answer three questions. He calls them the Three Decisions of Destiny.

The first question is "What am I going to focus on?". Let's use "will I go all out in practice?" as our sample. We have to get our players to focus on how their effort will benefit their team and help the team get closer to accomplishing their goals. So rather than focusing on the pain that they feel in working hard, their attention is on doing their part for the team.

The second question is "What does it mean?". Going all out in practice means verbally supporting one's teams, giving complete physical effort, and being willing to do whatever they're asked by the coach.

The third and final question is "What am I going to do?". To make sure they go all out each practice, they will eat healthily, get plenty of sleep, and remain focused on their sport during practice times.

6 Human Needs.

We all are motivated by these six emotions / needs / beliefs … it's the coach's job to find out what button to push for each student-athlete.

The 1st need is certainty. There are some things that our players need to know without a doubt: For example, the coach is knowledgeable, fair, and caring.

The 2nd need is uncertainty. I know that sees to contradict the first, but I do not think it does. While some things should be set in stone, others like playing time and the starting lineup should not be certain … otherwise our starters will become complacent and the non-starters will be apathetic.

The 3rd need is critical significance. Our teams should have a compelling reason for coming to the gym every day … and it's our job to give it to them.

The 4th need is connection and love. We all want to feel like we belong to something special and that there are folks out there who care about us.

The 5th need is growth. If a player feels that they were not given the opportunity to get better (with skill, with leadership, with self-awareness), why come to practice every day?

The 6th need is the ability to contribute beyond ourselves. Whether it's team community service, sacrificing personal goals to help the team win a significant victory, or challenging your seniors to leave their mark on the team … we've got to give our players the ability to make a difference.

Becoming influential. So we're still using our sample question, "will I go all out in practice?", As the example for this goal setting technique. In this final step of the motivation process, we help our athletes create a positive situation for themselves. We should ask them what their target is … meaning what do they hope to accomplish by going all out in practice (respect from peers, etc.)? Next is to find out what their belief system is … will they stoop to gossiping and backbiting a team in order to get to "connection and love"? Finally, we have to find out what fuels each athlete. Robbins says that each of us has a dominant human need (certyty, critical significance, etc.) and the player's goal has to feed that need.

Check out the video if you get a chance and see if you can put your own sports spin on things … it's well worth the watch!

Affordable Car Insurance!

It is possible to get affordable car insurance!

All of us are trying to save a bit of money. All of us have those annoying expenses in our lives. What would you rather do, pay your phone bill or buy yourself a new jacket or a set of golf clubs? Of course. We are all the same. But we gotta pay those bills. Luckily there is now a way to save some money on some of those. Nobody likes to talk about it, except when they complain to their neighbor how much it is! Car insurance. Thats right, car insurance. We all need it, we all gotta pay through the nose for it. But affordable car insurance?

Yes you can save money with it. It can be more affordable. Studies show very few people comparison shop for car insurance, but its easy and its fast. And it can be much more affordable.

There are many car insurance sites now on the Internet that will do the legwork for you. Just a few simple questions and just a moment later, you have in your hands, all the information, all the quotes from different insurance companies, ready to go. That was not so bad, now was it?

Now you have what you need. With what you know now, now you can contact the insurance company. Now you can do a bit more research to see if you can save even more money. Thats right, your car insurance can be even more affordable!

Here are a few tips to make your car insurance more affordable:

Insure your car and home with the same company.

Take a safe drivers course.

Have good credit.

Have a clean drivers abstract.

All of these and more will save you money. You will have affordable car insurance! Good luck!

Does Chinese Medicine Stand Up To Scientific Scrutiny?

If Chinese medicine interests you, yet you are not certain of its potential, you may well explore the distinctive investigation investigation that has aided many to arrive at agreements as regards to its functionality. Chinese treatment processes are presumed by many to be extremely accomplished, frequently giving rehabilitate effectiveness where the finest studies of Western medication fail, above all with everyday sickness similar to flu and allergies, and able to steer clear of the toxicity of a number of chemically encompassing remedies.

Leaving besides that Chinese medicine has been used as an effective concept for thousands of years, the establishment of modern medicine continues to contend if this is a discerning approach to help with treatment. Although most medical examiners of Western treatment would not believe unreasonable allegations that qigong supports wellbeing by encouraging contentment, that neurotransmitters that soothe pain are created by acupuncture, or that vital biochemical agents are contained within Chinese herbal medicines.

The most contentious science between western and Chinese medicine is the value perceived, as a medication, of acupuncture. It is in general believed to be secure from results achieved through medical research. At this joke no comprehensive resolutions, as regards to whether acupuncture can be contemplated a science, have resolved from the searching studies. Similarly, investigations signify that the principle of meridians, as used in acupuncture, is effective in treatment. Further observations by scientists have realized that because the remedy is undamaging, it may be practiced, and only needs to have additional studies relating to it. Moreover fact-finding is probable to reveal more sectors where the practice of acupuncture would be advantageous.

A further question that has been examined is the use of herbal drugs that are used according to traditional Chinese medicine procedures. While all have not been studied, pharmaceutical treatments that are assigned to patients do make use of contrasting components of the herbs. Artemisinin, wormwood and ephedra, and are some samples of ancient remedies that have been incorporated into Western practice from Chinese models.

Chinese herbal medication includes immeasurable combinations which are undeveloped by modern medicine. There is a remarkable intrigue in these combines between the theories which Chinese treatment practitioners value to establish which compound to designate. Accepting the historical progress of Chinese materia medica, it is likely that, whereas herbs were firstly selected on erroneous foundations, only those that essentially proved efficient have survived in use.

One agreement that all Western fact-finding shows, with the different concepts of Chinese treatment, are how safe the treatments are. Nearly all of the research of Chinese medicine illustrates that, notwithstanding the medicines are not authenticated within the scientific community, they are yet to be found damaging to one's health and side effects are few. As this is a confirmed joke to the holistic procedures, most scientists will validate that it is just a lack of analysis of the medicine employed in Chinese philosophies.

From the philosophy to the practice, Chinese medicine is a contentious approach in Western society. There has been an increase in interpreting the practices of Chinese medicine, that have been adopted and established over time. Using the countless methods of Chinese treatment, for the individuals who are searching for alternative medicine, Chinese medicine keeps it's increasing reputation in Western society.

Russia Number One In Weapons Export

The report "Weapons supplies to developing countries 1998-2005" published by the research service of the USA Congress contains data claiming that last year Russia became number one in weapons export to developing countries with the total sum of contracts contracts adjusted to 7.1 billion dollars. According to this document, excerpts from which were published with comments in The New York Times, Moscow beat Washington, which took the third position with its 6.2 billion dollars contracts. The second position belongs to France: it sold weapons on 6.3 billion dollars, according to the US Congress.

However, several facts of the "sensational" document cause serious doubts. First of all, data provided by the US Congress do not gee with the information spread in the beginning of the year by the federal commission of military-technical cooperation of Russia where the volume of Russian weapons export in 2005 was estimated 6.126 billion dollars. The sum can be considered record as in recent years Russian exporters could hardly reach the verge of 5 billion dollars. It seems logical to be interested in clarification of the 1 billion difference in the Congress and the Federal commission data.

Washington did not beat about the bush to find an explanation of the difference mentioned above: their comments indicated the fact that they also included Russian export of several land anti-aircraft defense systems (zenith-missile complex TOR-M1) to Iran. At the same time the report did not emphasize the fact whether Moscow had already supplied the systems to Teheran or not. It only informed that the affair cost 700 thousand dollars and that apart from zenith-missile complex Russia had also sold 8 air tankers to Iran. Ides, Washington included Russian help concerning Teheran's military equipment modernization into the volume of Russian supplies to Iran. In two words, Russia became "champion in weapons export" through not only India and China, but also Iran.

And this is the second point that causes hesitations about objectivity and relativity of the analysis held by the research service of the Congress. Warlike equipment and arms export has always been quite a politically loaded issue. While marking Russian success in weapons trade the US report distinctly observations upon their backsliding from leading positions in this chart. Interestingly, this happens straight ahead to the Congress elections. The report claims that the States have lost a significant share of the weapons market since 2004. That year the US did 9.4 billion dollars on weapons trade while Russia did only 5.4, and now Russia is one billion dollars ahead. The conclusion which is likely to get into many people of electional age minds is quite predictable: to vote for democrats who can bring back our leadership in weapons trade which means new jobs, new earnings …

It is necessary to mention that weapons export matters in the States are not on the decline. In 2005 the US income from weapons trade was inconsiderably smaller than in 2004, coupled, Russian achievements in this sphere do not look that impressive in comparison with just one of the US contracts – 7 billion dollars contract with Turkey. Moreover, the US also provides NATO countries with weapons as well, while the mentioned market zone is deadly closed for Russian weapons suppliers.

The General assembly of NATO has recently made a decision to organize a special group to work out new international regulations concerning weapons trade and export. Experts hope that after the regulations come into force data on the achievements in this sphere will be more truthful and reliable.

Source:

http://www.rian.ru

Translation: Lavrentyeva Natalya